The Supreme Court ended its October 2016 term earlier this week. During this term, the Court issued Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. on March 22, 2017, holding that an artistic feature incorporated into the design of a useful article is eligible for copyright protection. You can read our issue brief on this decision here . In late May, the Court also issued Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. , which addressed the scope of the patent exhaustion doctrine. In its discussion on the question of international exhaustion, the Court heavily referred to and followed the logic of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , ...